• Carrying out projects to strengthen the efficiency, individual development and maturity as a team.

Organizational Intelligence

What is it for?

  • To promote intelligent organization architecture, by identifying the ideas that govern groups (what we will do things for), what theories and methods we will use in our business, and with which tools and infrastructure.
  • Techniques intended to establish a climate of collaboration in which a group is having problems acting as a team in an Intelligent Organization.
  • In order to make a team be able to identify its aptitudes and conceptualize the forces and systems that are at stake. -> To develop personal command.
  • To identify the mental models that restrict the view of our surroundings and make us lose opportunities for improvement and/or business -> To develop mental models.
  • To develop a personal view in conjunction with the shared view. ->To promote the shared view.
  • To promote teamwork. To identify ways of thinking that limit their effectiveness.
  • To generate systemic thought. To generate a change of approach on situations and identify inter-relations in a team.

What tools are used normally?

  • Taopro Dynamics, the Band or the establishment and reproduction of metaphors for the dysfunctions of a team.
  • Group cohesion techniques.
  • The method “defining an Intelligent Organization” by Charlotte Roberts, adapted by ActitudPro.
  • The method “Designing an Intelligent Organization” by Rick Ross, adapted by ActitudPro.
  • The method Building a new team relations model. Charlotte Roberts.
  • The thought development method.
  • “Taopro Dynamics” to make aspects of the Intelligent Organization and guiding ideas emerge, by Patrice Levalois.
  • Taopro Dynamics, the Band or the establishment and reproduction of metaphors for the dysfunctions of a team.

Characteristics of the process

Benefits implied for the Company

  • Resolves situations of lack of motivation.
  • Improved productivity thanks to greater commitment.
  • Resolves situations of stagnated working climates.
  • Improves efficiency in the team thanks to communication.
  • The environment perceives an image of the brand and of the company in line with its values.
  • The well-known nature and the positioning of the brand are strengthened.
  •  Improved alignment of the organization
  •  Reduction in the time needed to take decisions.

Other results expected

Concern of the teams for continued improvement and self-training.

Profitability expected

Profitability of 120% on the investment made.

Cases of success

  • Industrial automation Sector. A company with 500 employees. Accompaniment for the management committee in order to identify mental models that may be causing difficulties for the development of the team.
  • Iron and Steel works distribution Industrial Sector. A company with 800 employees. Identification of team dysfunctions in relation to the organization of time and systems for improvement of meetings.
  • Natural cosmetics Sector. A company with 60 employees. Accompaniment for the management team in order to develop the personal command of each one of the members of the group.


Request for information